The Status Quo Is Not Good Enough.

By Herald de Paris Contributor's Bureau on January 22, 2010

By Veronica De La Cruz
LOS ANGELES (Herald de Paris) -
In light of the recent election of a Republican to fill the late Senator Ted Kennedy’s seat, the challenge of passing a sweeping reform bill to overhaul America’s health care system might appear to have gotten a little bit harder. But to those of us who view universal access to affordable health care as our most urgent domestic problem, it will not change our resolve.

According to the World Health Organization, the United States ranks a dismal 37th in quality of health care, far below other large nations (almost all of whom have some form of national health care coverage) and just below Costa Rica. In fact, we drop even lower on the report when it comes to “fairness” and “health level,” where our tolerance of discrimination against those with pre-existing conditions stands out as an embarrassing anomaly compared to other countries.

The Status Quo Is Not Good Enough.

On July 4, 2009, my brother Eric passed away after being denied private insurance for five years (read his story at www.ericslaw.com). It has broken my heart and my mother’s heart, and I am sad to report he is not alone. An estimated 44,000 people die each year in the U.S. because insurance was unavailable or inadequate to provide the treatment they needed. If you break it down, that’s an estimated 122 people who die every day because they cannot get in to see a doctor. And this is okay? Why do we continue to preserve a broken system that continues to fail the very citizens who make up and enrich the fabric of our nation?

And it doesn’t stop there. Thousands of Americans are bankrupted by medical bills which are soaring out of control. It happened to my family, and it can happen to yours. Pay attention, the reality is that nearly every other industrialized nation has a better health care system, according to the WHO, than we do. Our health care costs are far higher than other nations, and yet our government pays a far smaller share (at 44%) of the nation’s total expenditure on health care than other countries do. I have been spending some time in France (which ranks #1 in health care according to the WHO) and have spoken with numerous French people who tell me this would never happen in their country.

The bottom line is — America’s health care crisis is not a Democratic issue, nor a Republican issue. It is an American issue. And regardless of how the seats are filled in the House or Senate, all Americans have a right to expect this increasingly dangerous issue to be solved by their elected leaders.

Naïve as I know it sounds, health care reform should be about… well, health care reform, period. More specifically, it should be about human lives. Not bottom lines, not about 2012, not about 2010, and not about political score keeping.

What Choosing to Pass Health Care Reform Will Mean — to Politicians and to the People.

For politicians, namely the House Democrats needed to propel health care reform through this latest obstacle, the temptation to simply quit is obvious. But the benefits of doing so – silencing the political discord – will be temporary. To have worked on – and, most likely, voted for – some draft of health care reform over the past year, only to have NOTHING ultimately passed will surely be used against Democrats across the board. And their re-election hopes would probably be as dim as those of the last Democratic incumbents who failed on health care in 1994.

But should Democrats stand firmly (and, finally, united) behind an effort to get the Senate bill passed, those up for re-election this fall will immediately start seeing benefits delivered to constituents from what will be recognized as the most significant legislative achievement in decades. Things like an end to discrimination against those with pre-existing conditions, fewer insurance policy rescissions, the shrinking of the Medicare “donut hole” which translates into help for seniors, kids being kept on policies even after they graduate high school and until they are age 27 — well, these are all benefits that are REAL and would start IMMEDIATELY.

While many deliverables in the bill would have to wait, make no mistake that passing health care reform would begin improving people’s lives on day one. And doing so would at least ensure a majority of House Dems a fighting chance at re-election they may otherwise not have, not to mention a lasting achievement that no one will ever be able to take away.

Let’s Finish the Job.

So, after an evening engaging in self-pity and finger-pointing over Tuesday’s election in Massachusetts, progressives and health care reform supporters everywhere must now regroup and face the road ahead. More specifically, they must face the fork in the road ahead. The choices now facing Americans who want better, more affordable health care are to:

  1. Pass the bill before Brown gets seated: The simplest method, but it seems unlikely from a political standpoint and has already been discounted by many, as it would probably generate significant backlash and be viewed as an attempt to ignore the will of the electorate.
  2. Look for a new 60th vote among Republicans: Not a single GOP Senator backed the Senate bill before and it seems unlikely that any would risk the wrath of the Republican party now.
  3. Pass the Senate bill as-is: Perhaps the most feasible option, though the challenge here will be herding the needed votes among a fragmented majority in the House.
  4. Package the Senate bill with reconciliation: Could address the issues in getting the Senate bill through the House, but could also be politically unpopular, despite the fact the Republican party used the process twice to handle the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003.
  5. Give up: In the end, this might be an even bigger political loss to swallow than to attempt any of the four options above.
  6. Go with GOP Plan: Let me know when there is one.

As I write this, Democratic leadership in Washington is undoubtedly huddling to discuss these options and find a unified strategy. I hope to meet with some of those leaders in the next several days and remind them again of why it is so important not to give up and return to the status quo.

What Side of History Will Your Elected Official Be On?

I hope every member of Congress does some serious soul-searching today. By working to pass health care reform, as imperfect as it may initially be, they can make a life-changing difference to millions of Americans. The leaders who stand behind this mission will save thousands of people serious financial hardship and physical suffering every year, while ensuring higher quality care to millions more. And they may even save their political lives while they are at it.

No one ever said legislation was easy – especially if it creates fundamental change. Americans have a right to expect the health care crisis to be solved by leaders in Congress. But we must earn that right daily by demanding change. Loudly. Frequently. And persistently.

Since my brother died in July, I’ve been challenging our leaders in Washington, on both sides of the aisle, to be part of finding the solution rather than exacerbating the problem. Not next year, not in 20 years. Now.

Help ensure Congress does the right thing and finishes what they started. Call your representatives in Congress at 202-224-3121 and demand passage of health care reform now. You can also visit EricsLaw.com and sign our petition and share your own health care stories, which will be delivered to all members of the House and Senate next week.

Follow Veronica De La Cruz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/VeronicaDLCruz

#LCO


Comments
Beth January 22, 2010

This bill isn’t about providing health care. In Oregon, where they have public health care, many people are just being offered suicide pills instead of treatment because they aren’t considered worth the expense by the Oregon government. Why do so many people think that public health care options mean treatment for everyone at the highest level of technology? Free cancer treatment, free transplants, free everything? What it actually will mean is the lowest level of treatment for everyone! It will mean discount-store health care, not Saks Fifth Avenue. Read the news, why don’t you, and get a clue?

Tom January 23, 2010

Beth,
The reason so many people are supportive of a public option is because 30 or 40 million people currently have no access to affordable health care or insurance at all. The notions of death panels and “suicide pills,” as you suggest are commonplace have largely been debunked as rhetoric. Look at the 36 countries ranked ABOVE the US on the WHO report and you’ll notice a similarity. Namely the existence of a public health option. Moreover, proposed legislation under consideration now would not prevent you from continuing to pay for the high quality private coverage you want. It’s about protecting the most vulnerable in our society while preserving your right to whatever healthcare you want. The way things are going will mean fewer and fewer people will have any coverage at all. We have to change the system. It is not sustainable.

Rich January 25, 2010

Bravo to Ms. De La Cruz for displaying such courage in waging such a noble battle despite what must be an extremely difficult time of personal grief.

Health care reform in the United States is made so difficult by the influence that insurance, pharma and health providers have in the political process. Add to that the fact that this crisis has been 30 or more years in the making and you understand why any attempt to fix it is going to take a long time and be met with a lot of resistance from the for-profit enterprises which stand to lose money.

But Ms. De La Cruz is absolutely accurate and eloquent in stating that human life should outweigh corporate greed. And, at it’s heart, that is what is at stake in this battle. I applaud her for bravely stepping out and using her own experience as an illustration of an outcome that more and more Americans might face if change doesn’t come quickly. Thank you, Ms. De La Cruz.

K January 25, 2010

No one is being offered suicide pills in *any* state. Besides being unethical, euthanasia is illegal in the United States.

Joe January 25, 2010

Who’s going to pay for insuring another 30 million people?

If health insurance is so bad here, why do foreigners come here for quality care?

What makes you think the government can do a better job? If things need fixing, fix them; don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater.

This issue is so politicized. The insurance companies are made out to be evil entities because of that dirty word: profit.
Yet its okay for McDonalds or Ford or Citibank or Exxon to make profits?

I’m not saying the insurance company’s can’t be bad…. I also sympathize with people who’ve had problems with coverage.

But a universal option run by the government? That won’t drown the average taxpayer into even more debt thru taxes?

GIVE ME A BREAK!

Jason March 20, 2010

Joe you are so wrong.. McDonalds and Ford and Citibank and Exxon are not in the business of your LIFE. Do you think it is moral to sell your neighbors physical well being for profit, because that is the business of Healt Care Insurance companies. Deny claims, collect revenu and reap huge profits! Fine for products and services.. not so good for Life and Death

And If Insurance works great why won’t it work greater with 30 million more people paying premiums?

Leave a comment